Towards a Poor Theatre by Jerzy Grotowski, book cover

Towards a Poor Theatre Summary

by Jerzy Grotowski

4.25 Goodreads · 1k ratingsReference264 pages12-min summary

Grotowski's work explores actor-audience connection, removing theatrical excess to show the raw truth of performance.

As an Amazon Associate, BookBrief earns from qualifying purchases. How we're funded

By BookBrief EditorialPublished February 2026How we write summaries

Core Idea

Jerzy Grotowski's "Towards a Poor Theatre" is a call for theatre without non-essential elements—like scenery, costumes, makeup, or conventional lighting and sound—to focus only on the actor-spectator relationship. Grotowski believed that by removing external theatrical devices, theatre could return to its core, revealing the actor's true self and creating a deep, almost ritualistic meeting with the audience. This 'negative path' aims to go beyond simple entertainment, pushing the actor to engage in self-exploration and public honesty, and the spectator to become an active witness rather than a passive observer. This transforms theatre into a non-religious ritual of shared vulnerability.
Difficulty
Hard
Read it if
You are a theatre practitioner, director, actor, or scholar interested in experimental theatre, performance theory, or the philosophical underpinnings of actor training and audience engagement. This book is essential for understanding a pivotal movement in 20th-century theatre.
Skip it if
You are looking for a light read on conventional theatre history, practical playwriting tips, or a general introduction to mainstream theatrical production. This is a dense, philosophical, and intensely theoretical text.

Key Takeaways from Towards a Poor Theatre

The Poor Theatre Imperative

Stripping away theatrical excess to reveal the essence of performance.

Grotowski's 'Poor Theatre' is not about saving money, but a deep philosophical rejection of lavish theatrical shows. He believed that many sets, costumes, lighting, and sound effects distract from the heart of theatre: the direct meeting between actor and spectator. By removing everything non-essential, Grotowski aimed to find the basic elements of live performance, pushing theatre to its most powerful and real form. This stripping down forces both actor and audience to face raw human experience, focusing on presence, vulnerability, and the direct link between performer and witness. It is a call to remove pretense and focus on what truly matters in theatre.

“The rich theatre is one that uses a great number of technical tricks, a whole array of complicated machinery… We propose a poor theatre, which is a theatre without these things.”

In the book: Grotowski's work with the Polish Laboratory Theatre, where they eschewed traditional stage design, elaborate costumes, and even conventional lighting, often performing in found spaces or with minimal, symbolic props.

Try this: Artists and creators in any field can apply this principle by identifying and eliminating superfluous elements in their work. Focus on the core message, emotion, or experience you want to convey, and ruthlessly cut anything that doesn't directly serve that purpose. This forces a deeper engagement with the essential craft.

Related ideas: poor-theatre, theatrical-minimalism, essentialism

Actor-Spectator Relationship

Performance as an act of intimate confrontation and shared vulnerability.

Grotowski changed the actor-spectator relationship, moving it from passive watching to an active, almost ritualistic confrontation. He insisted that the actor should not just 'show' a character but 'offer' themselves, going through self-exploration and public honesty. This extreme vulnerability from the actor is meant to break down normal performance barriers, inviting the spectator into a deep, often uncomfortable, self-reflection. The audience watches not just a story, but a human being in a state of honest, open existence, which in turn causes a similar internal journey. This is not entertainment; it is a shared, transformative experience.

“The actor, by exposing himself, by sacrificing himself, challenges the spectator to self-analysis.”

In the book: Grotowski's exercises for actors, focusing on the elimination of 'blocks' and the achievement of total organic response, leading to performances described as 'acts of transgression' or 'secular holiness' where the actor's inner life was laid bare.

Try this: In any form of communication or presentation, strive for authenticity and vulnerability. Instead of merely presenting information, share a part of yourself or your genuine perspective. This creates a deeper connection and invites a more meaningful response from your audience, fostering empathy and trust.

Related ideas: actor-training, vulnerability, audience-engagement

The Via Negativa

Achieving mastery not by adding, but by removing obstacles.

Grotowski's training method, the 'via negativa' (negative path), differs greatly from traditional ways of learning skills. Instead of teaching actors new techniques, he focused on finding and removing the physical, vocal, and psychological blocks that stop an actor's natural impulses and true expression. These blocks include learned habits, self-consciousness, old clichés, and resistance to vulnerability. By systematically removing these layers of artifice and inhibition, Grotowski aimed to free the actor's natural ability, allowing for spontaneous, honest, and complete responses. It is a path of purification, showing the actor's natural potential rather than forcing outside forms.

“The process is not one of 'learning' something, but rather of 'unlearning' - removing the blocks that prevent the actor from being fully present and authentic.”

In the book: The rigorous physical and vocal exercises designed to break down habitual patterns and release tension, allowing the actor's body and voice to respond freely and expressively without intellectual interference.

Try this: In personal and professional development, identify and address your limiting beliefs, bad habits, or inefficient processes. Instead of constantly seeking new tools or information, consider what you can remove or unlearn to unleash your existing capabilities. This applies to writing, problem-solving, or even daily routines.

Related ideas: via-negativa, actor-training, de-conditioning, self-improvement

Theatre as a Secular Ritual

Creating a sacred space for collective transformation without religious dogma.

Grotowski saw theatre as having the power for deep, almost spiritual, change, like old rituals, but completely separate from religious beliefs. For him, the theatrical event was a gathering where actor and spectator engaged in a 'non-religious ritual,' a shared experience that explores basic human questions of life, death, and existence. The actor, through their radical self-exposure, acts as a guide, leading the audience through an internal journey. This ritual quality comes not from copying religious rites, but from the intensity, focus, and honesty of the performance, creating a unique, sacred space where deep psychological and emotional work can happen for everyone present.

“Theatre, when it is truly theatre, is a kind of ritual, a kind of confrontation, a kind of self-sacrifice.”

In the book: Performances like 'Akropolis' or 'The Constant Prince,' where the audience was placed in intimate proximity, sometimes even physically involved in the space, blurring the lines between observer and participant, creating an intense, almost claustrophobic shared experience.

Try this: When creating experiences for others – whether it's a presentation, a workshop, or a creative project – consider how to elevate it beyond mere information transfer or entertainment. Design moments of heightened focus, shared vulnerability, or profound reflection to create a more impactful and memorable 'ritualistic' experience.

Related ideas: ritual-theatre, transformative-art, collective-experience

Beyond Interpretation

The text as a springboard for creative exploration, not a sacred blueprint.

Grotowski had a new approach to classic dramatic texts. Unlike traditional theatre, which often prioritizes sticking to the playwright's original meaning, Grotowski saw the text as raw material, a 'score' to be deeply explored and even changed for the actor's and director's current vision. He believed that simply repeating old interpretations made classics lifeless. Instead, the text served as a starting point, a framework for actors to find their own deep connections and personal 'transgressions.' This often led to bold adaptations that removed historical context to show universal human themes, making the old relevant and real for a modern audience. The text became a tool, not the goal itself.

“The text is a scalpel, not a bible. It is an instrument to operate on the actor and spectator, not an object to be revered.”

In the book: Grotowski's radical adaptations of works by great playwrights like Calderón or Wyspiański, where he often deconstructed narratives, reordered scenes, and focused on specific themes or character relationships that resonated with his own theatrical inquiry, rather than a literal staging.

Try this: When approaching any established framework, brief, or historical precedent, don't be afraid to question its sacredness. Use it as a starting point for your own creative interpretation and exploration, bending or breaking conventions to find new meaning and relevance. This applies to design, writing, or problem-solving.

Related ideas: textual-deconstruction, theatrical-adaptation, creative-interpretation

The Actor-Spectator as Witness

The audience's role in actively completing the performance's meaning.

Grotowski's 'Poor Theatre' requires an active, involved spectator, moving beyond just watching. By removing distractions and showing raw, intense human experience, the audience is forced to fill in the gaps, to project their own inner world onto the performance. The meaning is not fully decided by the creators but comes from the unique interaction between the actor's offering and the spectator's reception. The audience becomes a 'witness,' not just to a story, but to an act of deep self-exposure, and in doing so, they become part of the event. This active witnessing completes the experience, making it deeply personal and meaningful, rather than just a show. It is a call for the audience to be fully present.

“The spectator is not only a witness but also, in a certain sense, a co-creator of the event.”

In the book: The intimate seating arrangements and unconventional performance spaces used by the Laboratory Theatre, often placing spectators within the action or in extremely close proximity, making escape from the intensity virtually impossible.

Try this: When presenting information or art, don't over-explain everything. Leave room for your audience to engage their imagination, draw their own conclusions, and connect with the material on a personal level. This fosters deeper understanding and ownership of the message.

Related ideas: active-audience, co-creation, witnessing

The Actor's Total Organism

Unifying body, voice, and psyche into a singular, responsive instrument.

For Grotowski, a truly effective actor is not just someone who can say lines or fake emotions, but a 'whole person' whose body, voice, and mind are connected and immediately responsive. His training aimed to break down the fake separation between these elements, which are often kept separate in normal acting. The goal was to reach a state where physical impulses, vocal expressions, and emotional states happen naturally and at the same time, without intellectual control or self-censorship. This needs great discipline, self-awareness, and the removal of physical and psychological blocks, allowing the actor to become a clear channel for expression, capable of spontaneous, honest, and strong responses. It is about complete, free presence.

“The actor's organism must be trained to respond without resistance, to offer itself totally without interference from the intellect or self-consciousness.”

In the book: Grotowski's 'Plastiques' and 'Resonances' exercises, which involved extreme physical contortions, vocalizations, and breath work designed to explore and expand the actor's physical and vocal range, connecting them directly to inner impulses.

Try this: In any demanding creative or physical endeavor, strive for full integration of your faculties. Whether it's public speaking, playing an instrument, or engaging in a sport, practice harmonizing your physical actions, mental focus, and emotional state to achieve peak performance and authentic expression.

Related ideas: actor-training, holistic-performance, organic-acting, mind-body-connection

The Actor as Human Being

Prioritizing the actor's internal journey over external character portrayal.

Grotowski's theatre changed the focus from 'playing a character' to the actor's deep personal journey and self-discovery. He believed that the most compelling theatre moments happen when the actor, through strict training and self-exploration, goes beyond just playing a role to show their own true humanity, weaknesses, and even 'unpleasant' truths. The character becomes a way for this self-exploration, rather than an external mask. This requires great courage and an almost strict dedication from the actor, who must be willing to 'sacrifice' their public image and explore their deepest selves. The result is a performance that is not just believable, but deeply human, meaningful, and often unsettlingly real.

“The actor who performs an 'act of transgression' reveals himself, not a role.”

In the book: The emphasis on the actor's 'total response' and the creation of 'scores' of physical and vocal actions that were deeply personal to each actor, allowing their individual humanity to shine through the framework of the text.

Try this: In leadership or interpersonal communication, strive to bring your authentic self to the interaction. Instead of trying to play a 'role,' share your genuine perspectives, struggles, and strengths. This builds trust and allows for more meaningful connections, fostering a culture of authenticity.

Related ideas: authentic-self, actor-identity, personal-revelation

The Enduring Craft

Theatre's unique power lies in its live, unrepeatable human encounter.

In a time increasingly dominated by film and television, Grotowski strongly defended theatre's unique and necessary value. He argued that theatre's essence is its live nature, its direct, immediate human meeting that can never be fully copied or saved. Unlike film, which is a fixed product, live theatre is a dynamic, temporary event, always being created and destroyed in the moment. This temporary nature is its strength, pushing both actor and spectator into a heightened state of presence and involvement. Grotowski's work was a constant search for what theatre must be, what no other medium can do, emphasizing the shared breath, the immediate connection, and the possibility for collective change that only a live performance can offer. It is a celebration of unique human craft.

“We are not trying to create a new theatre, but to find out what theatre really is.”

In the book: Grotowski's conscious decision to avoid filming or extensively documenting his performances, believing that the true experience could only be had live, in the moment, and any recording would betray its essence.

Try this: Identify the unique, irreplaceable qualities of your chosen craft or field that cannot be replicated by technology or other mediums. Double down on those intrinsic values. For writers, it might be the nuanced voice; for designers, the tactile experience; for educators, the interactive dialogue. Emphasize the human element.

Related ideas: liveness, theatre-essence, ephemeral-art, human-connection

Towards a Poor Theatre Quotes

“I am not interested in a theatre that would serve the purpose of entertaining me.”
Grotowski's fundamental rejection of theatre as mere entertainment.
“The actor's art is a matter of technique, not a matter of inspiration.”
Emphasizing the rigorous training and craft required for the actor.
“Poor Theatre is not a theatre of poverty, but a theatre that discovers its richness in what is essential.”
Clarifying the core concept of 'Poor Theatre' as stripping away non-essentials.
“The actor is a person who works with his body, not with his mind.”
Highlighting the physical, corporeal aspect of the actor's work.
“What is rich is not the abundance of means, but the abundance of possibilities.”
Reframing richness in theatre as potential and exploration, not material resources.
“To be an actor is to sacrifice oneself.”
Describing the profound commitment and personal sacrifice demanded by the actor's craft.
“The spectator must be confronted, not entertained.”
Advocating for a challenging, active experience for the audience, rather than passive reception.
“We do not deal with theatre as a synthesis of various creative disciplines, but as a specific art form.”
Distinguishing theatre's unique identity from other arts and rejecting its role as a mere amalgamation.
“The actor's work, if it is to be truly creative, must involve an act of transgression.”
Suggesting that genuine artistic creation requires breaking boundaries and conventions.
“The theatre must cease to be an imitation of life and become life itself.”
A call for theatre to be a direct, vital experience rather than a representation.
“We are not trying to create a 'new' theatre, but to rediscover the lost theatre.”
Implying a return to fundamental, ancient roots and purposes of theatrical expression.
“The elimination of elements not essential to the performance is not an act of impoverishment but of purification.”
Further defining the 'Poor Theatre' approach as a process of refinement.
“The actor is a human being who has given up his personal life to become a tool, an instrument.”
Describing the dedication required to transform oneself into an effective artistic instrument.
“The purpose of theatre is to meet, to confront, to provoke.”
Summarizing the active and challenging role Grotowski envisioned for theatre.

Quiz

10 questions on the main ideas. Each answer comes with a short explanation.

  1. Question 1

    Which of the following best encapsulates Grotowski's core philosophy regarding the actor-audience relationship in 'Poor Theatre'?

    1. To create a spectacle that entertains and distracts the audience from their daily lives.
    2. To eliminate the distance between actor and audience, forcing a direct, almost ritualistic confrontation.
    3. To prioritize elaborate sets and costumes to immerse the audience in a fictional world.
    4. To use the audience as passive observers who evaluate the technical skill of the performers.
    Show answer

    B. To eliminate the distance between actor and audience, forcing a direct, almost ritualistic confrontation. Grotowski emphasized breaking down the traditional barriers between actor and audience, seeking a direct, almost confrontational encounter that could lead to a deeper, more profound experience for both.

  2. Question 2

    What does Grotowski mean by 'Poor Theatre' in the context of his theatrical experiments?

    1. Theatre created with minimal financial investment, focusing on fundraising.
    2. Theatre that strips away non-essential elements like elaborate sets, costumes, and lighting, to focus on the actor's essence.
    3. Theatre performed by actors of limited experience or training.
    4. Theatre that aims to portray the lives of the impoverished and marginalized.
    Show answer

    B. Theatre that strips away non-essential elements like elaborate sets, costumes, and lighting, to focus on the actor's essence. 'Poor Theatre' is Grotowski's term for theatre that divests itself of everything not essential to the actor-spectator relationship, such as lavish scenery, costumes, and even sometimes text, to focus on the actor's physical and vocal truth.

  3. Question 3

    According to Grotowski, what is the primary function of the actor in 'Poor Theatre'?

    1. To faithfully execute the director's vision without personal input.
    2. To create a 'total act' through self-penetration and the stripping away of masks.
    3. To entertain the audience with technical virtuosity and showmanship.
    4. To deliver lines clearly and precisely according to the script.
    Show answer

    B. To create a 'total act' through self-penetration and the stripping away of masks. Grotowski's actor is not merely an interpreter but a 'holy actor' who undergoes a process of self-revelation, shedding defenses to expose their innermost being, creating a 'total act'.

  4. Question 4

    Grotowski frequently discusses the concept of 'via negativa'. What does this refer to in his theatrical practice?

    1. A method of character development through the accumulation of positive traits.
    2. The process of eliminating obstacles, blocks, and resistances in the actor's body and psyche.
    3. A technique for generating new ideas by rejecting traditional theatrical forms.
    4. The use of negative emotions to fuel a performance.
    Show answer

    B. The process of eliminating obstacles, blocks, and resistances in the actor's body and psyche. 'Via negativa' is Grotowski's approach to actor training, focusing on the removal of hindrances, resistances, and learned behaviors rather than the acquisition of new skills, allowing the actor's natural impulses to emerge.

  5. Question 5

    Which of the following statements accurately reflects Grotowski's view on the use of props and scenery in 'Poor Theatre'?

    1. Props and scenery should be elaborate and historically accurate to establish the setting.
    2. Props and scenery are entirely unnecessary and should always be eliminated.
    3. Props and scenery should be minimal, functional, and transformed by the actor's imagination and action.
    4. Props and scenery should be symbolic, representing abstract ideas rather than concrete objects.
    Show answer

    C. Props and scenery should be minimal, functional, and transformed by the actor's imagination and action. Grotowski advocated for minimal, functional props and scenery that could be transformed by the actor's use and the audience's imagination, rather than being literal representations. This aligns with the 'poor' aspect of his theatre.

  6. Question 6

    Grotowski discusses the 'holy actor'. What is the primary characteristic of this 'holy actor'?

    1. An actor who performs only sacred texts and religious dramas.
    2. An actor who sacrifices personal comfort and exposes their most intimate self for the audience.
    3. An actor who is technically flawless in their vocal and physical delivery.
    4. An actor who achieves celebrity status and is revered by the public.
    Show answer

    B. An actor who sacrifices personal comfort and exposes their most intimate self for the audience. For Grotowski, the 'holy actor' is one who undergoes a process of self-sacrifice and self-revelation, exposing their inner truth and vulnerability to the audience, creating a profound, almost spiritual encounter.

  7. Question 7

    In 'Towards a Poor Theatre', Grotowski argues that theatre should not compete with what other art forms?

    1. Literature and poetry.
    2. Painting and sculpture.
    3. Cinema and television.
    4. Music and dance.
    Show answer

    C. Cinema and television. Grotowski explicitly states that theatre should not try to imitate cinema or television, which excel at spectacle and realism. Instead, theatre should focus on what only it can do – the direct, live encounter between actor and spectator.

  8. Question 8

    Grotowski's approach to actor training is often described as a 'laboratory' rather than a school. What is the significance of this distinction?

    1. It implies a focus on scientific research and data collection in performance.
    2. It suggests a continuous process of experimentation, discovery, and refinement, rather than the transmission of fixed knowledge.
    3. It means the training takes place in a sterile, clinical environment.
    4. It indicates that only experienced actors are admitted for advanced study.
    Show answer

    B. It suggests a continuous process of experimentation, discovery, and refinement, rather than the transmission of fixed knowledge. The 'laboratory' metaphor highlights Grotowski's emphasis on ongoing experimentation, inquiry, and the testing of hypotheses about performance and the actor's craft, rather than a traditional pedagogical model of imparting established techniques.

  9. Question 9

    How does Grotowski view the theatrical text (the play script) in 'Poor Theatre'?

    1. The text is sacred and must be performed verbatim without any alterations.
    2. The text is merely a pretext or a 'springboard' for the actor's actions and explorations, not an end in itself.
    3. The text is primarily a historical document to be studied, not necessarily performed.
    4. The text should always be original and created by the ensemble during rehearsals.
    Show answer

    B. The text is merely a pretext or a 'springboard' for the actor's actions and explorations, not an end in itself. For Grotowski, the text was a 'score' or a 'pretext' – a starting point for the actor's physical and vocal work, which often led to radical re-interpretations or even the deconstruction of the original play.

  10. Question 10

    Grotowski's work often involved a specific spatial arrangement for performances. What was a common characteristic of these arrangements?

    1. A traditional proscenium arch stage with a clear separation between actors and audience.
    2. Flexible and variable audience seating that could be integrated into the performance space, blurring boundaries.
    3. Large outdoor amphitheatres to accommodate massive audiences.
    4. A fixed, circular arena stage with the audience surrounding it from all sides.
    Show answer

    B. Flexible and variable audience seating that could be integrated into the performance space, blurring boundaries. Grotowski experimented with various spatial configurations, often designing the audience's seating and perspective to be an integral part of each specific performance, breaking down the traditional stage-audience divide and creating unique relationships.

Towards a Poor Theatre FAQ

What is the core concept of 'Poor Theatre' as described by Grotowski?

'Poor Theatre' is Grotowski's radical approach to performance that strips away non-essential elements like elaborate sets, costumes, and lighting to focus solely on the actor-audience relationship and the actor's craft. It seeks to reveal the actor's inner self and create a direct, unmediated experience.

Does 'Poor Theatre' advocate for a literal lack of resources in theatrical productions?

While 'Poor Theatre' embraces simplicity and rejects lavish spectacle, its 'poorness' refers more to a philosophical stripping away of superfluous theatrical devices rather than just a budget constraint. The focus is on the essential elements of performance, which are the actor and the audience.

How does Grotowski's 'Poor Theatre' differ from traditional Western theatre practices?

Grotowski's approach diverges significantly by rejecting the illusionistic and representational aspects common in traditional Western theatre. Instead, it emphasizes confrontation, ritual, and the actor's 'transgression,' aiming for a profound, almost spiritual encounter rather than mere entertainment or storytelling.

What is the 'via negativa' in Grotowski's methodology?

The 'via negativa,' or negative way, is Grotowski's training method for actors that involves systematically eliminating blocks, resistances, and superficial techniques. It aims to strip away artificiality and expose the actor's authentic impulses, allowing for a more direct and truthful expression.

Is 'Towards a Poor Theatre' still relevant for contemporary theatre practitioners?

Absolutely. Despite its age, the book remains a foundational text for exploring actor training, performance theory, and the essential nature of theatre. Its principles challenge conventional thinking and inspire new generations of artists to question and innovate.

How does Grotowski view the role of the audience in 'Poor Theatre'?

Grotowski sees the audience not as passive observers, but as active participants in a shared event. The aim is to create an intimate, almost ritualistic encounter where the audience is deeply affected and confronted by the authenticity and vulnerability of the actor.

What practical exercises or training methods are discussed in the book?

While the book is more theoretical and philosophical, it outlines the principles behind Grotowski's actor training, focusing on physical and vocal discipline, the elimination of obstacles, and the search for organic reactions. It describes the 'via negativa' as the core approach to actor development.

How is Grotowski's work different from Stanislavski's system?

While both emphasize actor truth, Grotowski's 'Poor Theatre' radically departs from Stanislavski's focus on psychological realism and character immersion. Grotowski sought to transcend psychological portrayal, pushing actors towards a more ritualistic, archetypal, and physically extreme expression, often stripping away the 'character' in favor of the 'being' of the actor.

About the author

Jerzy Grotowski

Jerzy Grotowski

Jerzy Grotowski was a Polish theater director and innovator known for his influential work in theater arts during the 20th century. He is best known for his book "Towards a Poor Theatre," which outlines his philosophy of theater that emphasizes the actor's craft and the audience's experience over elaborate production values. Grotowski's ideas have significantly impacted contemporary theater practices.

Similar books

  • The Story of Art

    E.H. Gombrich

    3.9 (311k) average on GoodreadsReference

    Explore thousands of years of human creativity, from ancient cave art to modern masterpieces, with Gombrich's classic account, updated with new insights into art's changing story.

  • The New Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain

    Betty Edwards

    3.9 (297k) average on GoodreadsPsychology

    Learn to draw by using the often-ignored visual side of your brain, changing how you see the world.

  • Go Ask Alice

    Anonymous

    3.7 (293k) average on GoodreadsReference

    A teenage girl's diary chronicles her swift decline into 1970s drug culture, from an innocent game to addiction, ending in her tragic death.

  • Their Eyes Were Watching God

    Zora Neale Hurston

    3.9 (266k) average on GoodreadsReference

    In early 20th-century Florida, Janie Crawford searches for identity, love, and independence, defying social norms to find her voice.

  • On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft

    Stephen King

    4.3 (222k) average on GoodreadsBiography
  • Holy Bible: King James Version

    Anonymous

    4.4 (220k) average on GoodreadsReference

    This foundational text, spanning millennia and continents, combines divine revelation, human history, and lasting wisdom, shaping the spiritual and ethical outlook of Western civilization.

More Reference summaries →

Enjoyed the summary?

A summary gives you the shape of the book. The book itself has the detail, the examples and the voice.

Find Towards a Poor Theatre on Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, BookBrief earns from qualifying purchases. How we're funded