Synopsis
Covers the whole plot, including the ending.
- Difficulty
- Easy
- Pacing
- Moderate
- Mood
- Melancholy, Thought-provoking, Cautionary
- Read it if
- You enjoy allegorical tales, fables with clear moral lessons, or classic children's literature that explores themes of friendship, sacrifice, and selfishness.
- Skip it if
- You prefer complex narratives, happy endings, or stories without overt moralizing.
The Devoted Friend Plot Summary
Covers the whole plot, including the ending.
The Water-rat's Skepticism
The story starts with a Linnet telling the tale of Hans and the Miller to a Water-rat, who initially dislikes the idea of friendship, preferring practical matters. The Linnet, however, insists on friendship's beauty and importance, contrasting it with the Water-rat's cynical view. The Linnet's story aims to show true devotion, even if it is later used. The Water-rat remains unconvinced, finding the Linnet's romanticized view impractical, which sets the stage for the sad tale and foreshadows his later criticism of the Miller's actions.
Hugh the Miller and Little Hans
Hugh the Miller is introduced as a seemingly kind and rich man who constantly claims to be a good friend to Little Hans, a poor but hardworking gardener. The Miller often visits Hans's garden, admiring his flowers and taking bouquets. Despite his apparent affection, the Miller never helps Hans, saying that true friendship means not bothering friends with requests. He justifies his constant taking by promising to give Hans his old wheelbarrow, a gift always put off. Hans, simple and loyal, believes the Miller and continues to give freely.
The Hard Winter
When winter comes, Hans's garden has no flowers, and he becomes very poor. The Miller, despite his wealth, does not visit Hans or help him. He claims it would be wrong to bother a friend in trouble and that true friendship means leaving someone alone during hardships. He also fears that helping Hans would make Hans jealous of his own wealth. Hans endures the cold and hunger alone, selling his few remaining things to survive. His loyalty to the Miller, however, stays strong, as he expects the Miller to return in spring.
Spring's Deceptive Promise
As spring arrives and Hans's flowers bloom again, the Miller quickly reappears, praising Hans's garden and reaffirming his 'friendship.' He immediately asks Hans for a large plank of wood, saying he needs it for his barn. Hans, eager to please his 'best friend,' readily agrees, even though he has to carry the heavy plank a long way. The Miller again mentions the old wheelbarrow, promising it to Hans as a reward for his help, which strengthens Hans's belief in his generosity and the eventual repayment of his kindness.
A String of Favors
After the plank incident, the Miller continues to use Hans's good nature with many requests. He asks Hans to run errands, carry sacks of flour to market, and do various chores, always promising the wheelbarrow in return. Hans, being simple and loyal, never refuses, even when these tasks interfere with his own gardening and livelihood. He believes that by helping the Miller, he is making their friendship stronger and will eventually get the promised gift, unaware that he is being used.
The Broken Wheelbarrow
One day, the Miller finally 'gives' Hans the long-promised wheelbarrow. However, it is old, broken, and missing a wheel. He makes Hans promise to repair it himself, claiming he has no time. Hans, though disappointed by its condition, is still grateful, believing the Miller has finally kept his promise. This act shows the Miller's manipulative nature, as he appears generous while giving Hans a burden and getting even more labor from him.
The Miller's Son Falls Ill
Late one stormy night, the Miller's son gets sick. The Miller's wife suggests getting the doctor, but the Miller, not wanting to get wet or ruin his boots, immediately thinks of Hans. He sends Hans out into the dark, heavy rain to get the doctor, despite the dangerous conditions. Hans, always loyal and trusting, immediately leaves, believing he is performing an important act of friendship, unaware of the Miller's selfish reasons and the danger he is in.
Hans's Tragic Demise
Hans bravely goes out into the storm, walking many miles to get the doctor. On his way back, because of the darkness and flooded roads, he falls into a ditch and drowns. His body is found the next morning. This sad event results directly from the Miller's selfish refusal to go himself and his exploitation of Hans's loyalty. Hans, the devoted friend, dies while doing a service for someone who never truly cared for him.
The Miller's Hypocritical Grief
At Hans's funeral, the Miller appears prominently, crying loudly and claiming to be Hans's 'best friend.' He pretends to be very sad, but his real concern shows when he complains about the trouble of Hans's death, especially losing his old, broken wheelbarrow that Hans was supposed to fix. He also worries about who will do all the favors Hans used to do. His act clearly shows his hypocrisy, demonstrating his complete lack of real affection for Hans.
The Water-rat's Verdict
After hearing the whole story, the Water-rat calls it a terrible tale with no moral, as he cannot understand why the Miller didn't give Hans something for all his help. He criticizes the Linnet for telling such a sad story. The Linnet tries to explain the moral about true friendship, but the Water-rat remains focused on the transactional aspect, reinforcing his earlier cynicism. He waddles off, convinced that the story only proves his point about how impractical selfless devotion is, completely missing the deeper criticism of exploitation.
Principal Figures
Little Hans
Protagonist
A kind, simple-hearted gardener who is exploited for his devotion.
Little Hans is a poor but hardworking gardener known for his beautiful flowers and his unwavering loyalty. He is simple-minded and trusting, easily swayed by the Miller's flattery and false promises. His devotion to the Miller is absolute, leading him to perform countless favors without expecting immediate reciprocation, believing in the Miller's sincerity and the eventual reward of the promised wheelbarrow. He embodies pure, selfless friendship, which ultimately leads to his downfall.
Relationships: Hugh the Miller (Exploited friend; Hans is devoted, Miller is manipulative.); The Linnet (Subject of the Linnet's cautionary tale about friendship.)
Hugh the Miller
Antagonist
A wealthy, selfish man who exploits Hans's friendship for his own gain.
Hugh the Miller is prosperous and outwardly charming, but deeply selfish and manipulative. He professes great friendship for Hans, but only when it benefits him, constantly making demands while offering only empty promises (the wheelbarrow). He avoids helping Hans during difficult times, rationalizing his inaction with hypocritical statements about the nature of friendship. His actions are driven by greed and a desire to maintain his comfortable life without inconvenience, even at the cost of another's well-being.
Relationships: Little Hans (Exploiter of Hans's friendship; claims to be Hans's best friend.); The Miller's Wife (Wife; shares his practical, self-serving outlook.)
The Linnet
Supporting
The storyteller who attempts to convey the true meaning of friendship.
The Linnet is a wise and empathetic bird who narrates the story of Hans and the Miller. She believes deeply in the beauty and importance of true friendship, contrasting it with the cynical views of the Water-rat. Her purpose in telling the tale is to illustrate the dangers of false friendship and the tragedy that can befall the truly devoted. She serves as the moral compass of the framing narrative, attempting to impart a lesson that the Water-rat is unwilling to accept.
Relationships: The Water-rat (Storyteller to the Water-rat; debates the nature of friendship with him.)
The Water-rat
Supporting
A cynical and practical animal who dismisses the story's moral.
The Water-rat is a pragmatic and self-interested character who views friendship solely through a transactional lens. He dismisses sentimentality and focuses on tangible benefits, finding the Linnet's story of Hans and the Miller to be without a proper 'moral' because Hans received no material reward. His cynicism highlights the story's critique of a society that values practicality over genuine human connection and devotion. He represents the kind of superficial thinking that enables exploitation.
Relationships: The Linnet (Audience and debater; challenges the Linnet's romantic view of friendship.)
The Miller's Wife
Mentioned
The Miller's practical and equally self-serving spouse.
The Miller's wife is briefly mentioned, primarily in the scene where their son falls ill. She suggests fetching the doctor, but her husband's immediate thought is to send Hans, indicating her complicity or at least acceptance of his exploitative nature. She seems to share the Miller's pragmatic and self-interested worldview, prioritizing convenience and avoiding personal inconvenience, even when it means endangering another.
Relationships: Hugh the Miller (Wife; shares his practical, self-serving outlook.); Little Hans (Indirectly benefits from Hans's exploitation.)
The Doctor
Mentioned
The recipient of Hans's fatal errand.
The Doctor is a minor, unseen character whose illness is the catalyst for Hans's final, fatal errand. He represents the urgent need that the Miller exploits, sending Hans out into a dangerous storm. His presence in the narrative underscores the Miller's extreme selfishness, as he prioritizes his own comfort over the safety of his 'friend' when faced with a family emergency.
Relationships: Hugh the Miller's Son (Healer of the sick son.)
Themes & Insights
The Nature of True Friendship vs. False Friendship
The story sharply contrasts real, selfless loyalty with manipulative, self-serving pretense. Little Hans shows true friendship through his steady loyalty, generosity, and willingness to help, even at personal cost. The Miller, in contrast, represents false friendship, using flattery and empty promises to exploit Hans's good nature for his own gain. His 'friendship' is about what he can get, as seen when he avoids Hans in winter but quickly reappears in spring to demand favors. The tragedy highlights how true devotion can be vulnerable to such exploitation.
“What is the good of having a friend, if one is not to get anything out of him?”
Exploitation and Selfishness
A main theme is the terrible impact of exploitation driven by selfishness. The Miller constantly uses Hans's kindness, labor, and resources, giving nothing substantial in return. His excuses for not helping Hans during winter or for sending Hans into the storm are thin reasons for his own comfort. The story criticizes those who act like benefactors or friends while systematically draining others for personal gain, which leads to Hans's death and the Miller's fake sadness, tinged with annoyance over losing his 'free labor.'
“Really, I don’t think that I should tell you to trouble about it. You had much better mend your own wheelbarrow, and I will mend mine, for I am sure I should not like you to get into any trouble on my account.”
Naive Trust and its Consequences
Hans's steady, almost childlike trust in the Miller's good intentions is a key part of the story. Despite many times the Miller took advantage of him and never kept his promises, Hans continues to believe in their 'friendship' and the eventual reward of the wheelbarrow. This naive trust makes him very open to exploitation. His failure to see the Miller's true character leads to his sad death, showing the dangers of blind faith and devotion when given to someone unworthy.
“He was so devoted to the Miller, that he would do anything that the Miller asked him to do.”
Social Critique of Materialism and Hypocrisy
The story acts as a strong social critique, especially clear in the Miller's character and the Water-rat's reaction. The Miller represents the materialistic person who values possessions and convenience more than human connection. His hypocrisy is exposed at Hans's funeral, where his loud crying is quickly followed by complaints about losing his wheelbarrow and free labor. The Water-rat's inability to see a 'moral' beyond transactional gain further emphasizes this critique, suggesting that society often puts practical, self-serving outcomes before selflessness and real affection.
“I will give you my old wheelbarrow. It is not a very pretty wheelbarrow, but it will be a comfort to you.”
Plot Devices & Literary Techniques
Framing Narrative
A story within a story, used to introduce and comment on the main plot.
The tale of Little Hans and the Miller is embedded within a conversation between a Linnet and a Water-rat. This framing device allows for an external commentary on the events, highlighting different perspectives on friendship and morality. The Linnet tells the story to illustrate the true meaning of devotion, while the Water-rat's cynical reactions provide a foil, emphasizing the story's critique of superficiality and materialism. It also serves to distance the author slightly, allowing the philosophical debate to unfold naturally.
Ironic Contrast
The juxtaposition of stated intentions or appearances with actual actions and outcomes.
The story is rich with ironic contrast. The Miller constantly professes to be Hans's 'best friend' while systematically exploiting him. His claims of fostering true friendship by not burdening Hans with help during winter stand in stark contrast to his immediate demands for favors in spring. The most poignant irony is his performative grief at Hans's funeral, immediately followed by complaints about losing his old wheelbarrow and his free labor, exposing the hollowness of his declared affection.
Symbolism of the Wheelbarrow
A promised gift that represents false hope and the transactional nature of the Miller's 'friendship'.
The wheelbarrow functions as a central symbol. It is the Miller's perpetually promised 'gift' to Hans, a tangible representation of the Miller's manipulative generosity. It offers Hans false hope and serves as a constant justification for his continued labor. When it is finally 'given,' it is old, broken, and requires Hans to fix it himself, symbolizing the Miller's ultimate self-interest and the worthlessness of his 'gifts.' It underscores how the Miller gives only what is convenient and still extracts more from Hans.
Foreshadowing
Hints or clues about future events, particularly Hans's tragic end.
Foreshadowing is subtly used throughout the narrative to hint at Hans's eventual demise and the Miller's unchanging selfishness. The Miller's repeated neglect of Hans during winter, coupled with his constant demands for favors, gradually builds a sense of Hans's vulnerability. The final, dangerous errand in the storm, explicitly initiated by the Miller's refusal to go himself, clearly points towards the tragic outcome, making Hans's death feel inevitable due to the Miller's callousness.
The Devoted Friend Quotes
“What is the use of a good intention unless it is carried out?”
“Real friendship, like real poetry, is extremely rare—and even more rare is the real devoted friend.”
“I am quite sure I shall be very happy with him. He is so thoughtful of others, and so fond of flowers.”
“It is not at all a bad thing that he should work. All good citizens should work.”
“I will certainly come and see you, and you will give me a large basket of primroses, and we will talk about what a pleasure it is to be a friend.”
“He was so devoted to him that he never once went to see him, even when he was ill.”
“Your only object in life should be to give pleasure to others.”
“It is quite a different thing to be a friend of someone who is poor.”
“I am so glad to hear you are rich, for I am very fond of rich people.”
“I am quite sure that when he is rich he will remember me.”
“A good example is always worth more than a good lecture.”
“He was such a devoted friend that he would not let Hans do anything for him.”
“I have a great many friends, but I have no devoted friend.”
Quiz
10 questions on the plot and the characters. Each answer comes with a short explanation.
Question 1
What was the Miller's name in 'The Devoted Friend'?
- Hugh
- Hans
- Little Hans
- Hugh the Miller
Show answer
D. Hugh the Miller The Miller's name is explicitly stated as Hugh, and Hans is referred to as 'Little Hans'.
Question 2
What did the Miller often say about true friendship?
- True friends share everything, especially money.
- True friendship is the most precious thing in the world, and friends should always help each other.
- True friends never ask for favors.
- True friendship is a burden one must bear.
Show answer
B. True friendship is the most precious thing in the world, and friends should always help each other. The Miller frequently preached about the virtues of true friendship, often while exploiting Hans, stating it was 'the most precious thing in the world'.
Question 3
What was Hans's primary occupation?
- A baker
- A miller
- A gardener
- A farmer
Show answer
C. A gardener Hans was a gardener, known for his beautiful flowers and fruits, which the Miller often took.
Question 4
Why did the Miller refuse to visit Hans during the winter?
- He was ill and couldn't leave his house.
- He didn't want Hans to ask him for food or help.
- He was traveling for business.
- He was busy preparing for spring planting.
Show answer
B. He didn't want Hans to ask him for food or help. The Miller explicitly stated he didn't want to trouble Hans or have Hans think he needed anything from him during the winter, which was a selfish excuse to avoid helping Hans.
Question 5
What was the Miller's 'most generous offer' to Hans?
- To give Hans a new wheelbarrow in exchange for all his primroses.
- To let Hans borrow his ladder for a year.
- To share his flour with Hans during the winter.
- To help Hans mend his roof.
Show answer
A. To give Hans a new wheelbarrow in exchange for all his primroses. The Miller repeatedly promised Hans his old wheelbarrow, but only after extracting numerous favors and all of Hans's valuable primroses.
Question 6
What object did the Miller lend to Hans that proved to be a constant source of obligation?
- His axe
- His ladder
- His wheelbarrow
- His sack of flour
Show answer
B. His ladder The Miller lent Hans his ladder, but then repeatedly demanded its return for trivial reasons, often having Hans travel long distances to do so, consuming Hans's time and energy.
Question 7
What event ultimately led to Hans's death?
- He fell ill from malnutrition during the winter.
- He was crushed by his own wheelbarrow.
- He drowned in a ditch while fetching the doctor for the Miller's son.
- He was attacked by wild animals in the forest.
Show answer
C. He drowned in a ditch while fetching the doctor for the Miller's son. Hans died after falling into a ditch and drowning on a stormy night, while running to fetch the doctor for the Miller's sick son, an errand the Miller insisted he undertake immediately.
Question 8
What was the Miller's primary concern after Hans's death?
- The well-being of Hans's family.
- The loss of his own wheelbarrow.
- His own grief over losing a friend.
- The cost of Hans's funeral.
Show answer
B. The loss of his own wheelbarrow. At Hans's funeral, the Miller complained bitterly about the loss of his wheelbarrow, which he had never actually given to Hans, showing his ultimate selfishness.
Question 9
Which animal narrates the story and provides commentary on the Miller's actions?
- A Water-rat
- A Linnet
- A Duck
- A Swallow
Show answer
A. A Water-rat The story is framed as a conversation between a Water-rat and a Linnet, with the Water-rat serving as the primary narrator of Hans's tale.
Question 10
What is the ultimate irony of the Miller's character and his philosophy on friendship?
- He believed in sharing, but only when it benefited him.
- He preached about the duties of friendship, but never fulfilled them himself, instead exploiting his 'friend' to his death.
- He taught Hans valuable lessons about self-reliance.
- He genuinely loved Hans but was too proud to show it.
Show answer
B. He preached about the duties of friendship, but never fulfilled them himself, instead exploiting his 'friend' to his death. The Miller consistently lectured Hans and others on the importance of true friendship and its duties, all while systematically taking advantage of Hans, ultimately leading to Hans's demise, without ever offering genuine help in return.
The Devoted Friend FAQ
What is the central premise of 'The Devoted Friend'?
The story centers on the exploitative friendship between Hugh the Miller and Hans the gardener. Hugh consistently takes advantage of Hans's generosity and labor under the guise of being a 'devoted friend,' ultimately leading to Hans's tragic demise.
Who are the main characters in 'The Devoted Friend'?
The primary characters are Hugh the Miller, a prosperous but selfish man, and Little Hans, a kind-hearted and diligent gardener. The story also features the Water-rat, who serves as a skeptical audience to the Linnet's narration.
How does Hugh the Miller rationalize his exploitation of Hans?
Hugh rationalizes his actions by claiming that true friendship means never inconveniencing a friend, and that it would spoil Hans to have too much money. He believes he is doing Hans a favor by accepting all his produce and services, reinforcing Hans's 'devotion' to him.
What is the ultimate fate of Little Hans?
Little Hans tragically drowns in a ditch while running an urgent errand for the Miller. He was asked to fetch a doctor for the Miller's son on a stormy night, a task that was dangerous and ultimately fatal due to the Miller's broken lantern promise.
What role does the Water-rat play in the narrative framework?
The Water-rat acts as an incredulous and cynical listener to the Linnet's story. He constantly interrupts with practical, self-interested questions and dismisses the moral of the tale, highlighting a different perspective on friendship and self-preservation.
What specific promises does Hugh the Miller make to Hans that he never keeps?
Hugh promises Hans an old wheelbarrow, a broken lantern, and a plank of wood, none of which he ever delivers. Instead, he constantly demands favors from Hans, such as carrying sacks of flour, tending his garden, and even fetching a doctor, without ever reciprocating.
How does the changing of seasons reflect Hans's situation?
The story emphasizes Hans's hard work throughout all seasons, from planting in spring to harvesting in summer. The harsh winter, during which Hans is alone and struggling, contrasts sharply with the Miller's prosperity and his subsequent demands on Hans when spring returns, highlighting Hans's perpetual disadvantage.
Is there any subtle hint that Hans might have been aware, at some level, of the Miller's true nature?
While Hans is presented as naive, his occasional 'sighs' and 'sad' expressions when the Miller makes another demand suggest a subconscious discomfort or burden, even if he doesn't consciously acknowledge the Miller's selfishness. He never openly challenges the Miller.
What is the significance of the Miller's comment about 'spoiling' Hans with money?
This comment reveals the Miller's manipulative psychology, where he frames his stinginess as an act of kindness. He uses this excuse to avoid helping Hans financially, while simultaneously benefiting immensely from Hans's unpaid labor and produce.
How does Hans's selflessness contribute to his own downfall?
Hans's unwavering selflessness and inability to refuse a friend's request make him vulnerable to exploitation. His devotion, though admirable in itself, is tragically misdirected towards a person who lacks any reciprocal empathy, leading him to overexert himself and ultimately die.
Analyze the Miller's reaction to Hans's death at the funeral.
At Hans's funeral, the Miller displays performative grief, complaining about the inconvenience of Hans's death and the loss of his 'best friend.' He is more concerned with his own reputation and the burden of the funeral than with genuine sorrow for Hans, showing his superficiality.
How does the Linnet's storytelling style influence the reader's perception of the moral?
The Linnet tells the story with sincere earnestness and believes deeply in the moral lesson it conveys. This direct, simple narration aims to evoke sympathy for Hans and condemnation for the Miller, clearly guiding the reader towards a moral interpretation of true friendship.
Is 'The Devoted Friend' merely a children's story, or does it carry deeper allegorical meanings?
While presented as a children's tale, it carries profound allegorical meanings about social class, exploitation, and the nature of true vs. false friendship. It critiques societal structures where the powerful take advantage of the less fortunate, and examines the dangers of naive generosity.
What is the primary moral lesson Wilde intends to convey through this story?
Wilde primarily intends to critique false friendship and expose the dangers of one-sided relationships built on exploitation. He highlights that true friendship requires reciprocity, genuine care, and not just taking advantage of another's kindness.
How does the Water-rat's reaction challenge or complicate the story's moral?
The Water-rat's cynical and self-interested reaction directly challenges the Linnet's moral. By dismissing the story as having 'no moral' and prioritizing practicality, the Water-rat represents a more jaded, realistic, or even selfish perspective that exists in the world, complicating the idealism of the Linnet.
Could Hans have acted differently to avoid his fate, or was he inherently doomed by his nature?
While Hans's trusting nature made him vulnerable, he could potentially have set boundaries or refused some of the Miller's demands. However, given the social dynamics and Hans's deeply ingrained kindness, it's debatable whether he *could* have acted differently without fundamentally changing his character, suggesting a tragic inevitability within the story's framework.
What is Wilde's broader commentary on society or human nature in 'The Devoted Friend'?
Wilde critiques the hypocrisy and self-interest often masked by polite society and sentimental language. He exposes how wealth and power can corrupt relationships, leading to the exploitation of the innocent and generous, and highlights the prevalent lack of genuine empathy in human interactions.
Why does Wilde choose a bird (Linnet) and a rodent (Water-rat) to frame this human story?
Using animal characters allows Wilde to present a fable-like quality, distancing the specific human characters while universalizing the moral. The Linnet's poetic nature contrasts with the Water-rat's pragmatic one, allowing for a debate on the story's meaning from different 'natural' perspectives, making the commentary on human nature more stark.
Similar books
- The Happy Prince
Oscar Wilde
4.2 (26k) average on GoodreadsFantasyAnother allegorical tale by Wilde exploring themes of sacrifice and compassion.
- The Little Prince
Antoine De Saint Exupéry
A philosophical children's book with a strong moral message about human nature.
- Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
J.K. Rowling
4.5 (7M) average on GoodreadsFantasyRescued from a miserable life under the stairs, an orphaned boy discovers he's a wizard destined for a magical school, where he uncovers a dangerous secret tied to the dark wizard who murdered his parents.
- The Hunger Games
Suzanne Collins
4.3 (6.4M) average on GoodreadsFantasyIn a future where children fight to the death on live television, Katniss Everdeen volunteers for the arena, turning a death sentence into a fight for survival and a spark of rebellion.
- 1984
George Orwell
4.2 (3.1M) average on GoodreadsPoliticsIn a future where surveillance and thought control are absolute, a man's search for truth clashes with the Party, showing that hope can be a form of rebellion.
- Divergent
Veronica Roth
4.2 (2.9M) average on GoodreadsFantasyIn a society divided by virtues, a sixteen-year-old's difference from the norm starts a rebellion that threatens her world.
Enjoyed the summary?
A summary gives you the shape of the book. The book itself has the detail, the examples and the voice.
Find The Devoted Friend on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate, BookBrief earns from qualifying purchases. How we're funded







