Common Sense by Thomas Paine, book cover

Common Sense Summary

by Thomas Paine

3.98 Goodreads · 30k ratingsPolitics104 pages13-min summary

In "Common Sense," Thomas Paine argues forcefully for American independence, dismantling the idea of monarchy and urging the colonies to create a new republican future.

As an Amazon Associate, BookBrief earns from qualifying purchases. How we're funded

By BookBrief EditorialPublished February 2026How we write summaries

Core Idea

Thomas Paine's "Common Sense" argues for American independence from British rule. It states that government is a necessary evil meant only to protect life, liberty, and property. Paine attacks monarchy and hereditary succession as absurd, unnatural, and tyrannical. He believes America's resources and economy make it self-sufficient, and that staying with Britain harms its prosperity and moral standing.
Difficulty
Easy
Read it if
You want to understand the foundational arguments for American independence, appreciate the power of persuasive political rhetoric, or grasp how a single pamphlet galvanized a revolution.
Skip it if
You are looking for a nuanced historical account of the American Revolution, a deep dive into political theory, or a lengthy academic treatise.

Key Takeaways from Common Sense

Government as a Necessary Evil

Paine argues that government, while necessary, is inherently a restraint on natural liberty and should be structured to minimize harm.

Paine draws a clear line between society and government. Society, he says, comes from our needs and brings happiness by connecting us. Government, however, comes from our flaws and is a necessary evil, a 'badge of lost innocence,' needed only because our morals are not enough to stop bad behavior. Its only job is to protect life, liberty, and property, and it should be judged only on how well it does this. Any government that goes beyond this minimal role, or fails to protect its citizens, becomes tyrannical and illegitimate. This idea sets the stage for challenging existing power structures, especially monarchy, by removing any divine right to rule and reducing government to a simple tool.

“Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

In the book: Paine uses the analogy of a group of isolated individuals forming a society, where initial natural liberty eventually gives way to the need for rules and a governing body as their numbers grow and complexities arise, illustrating government's origin not from divine decree but from practical necessity and human failings.

Try this: When evaluating any proposed law or governmental action, ask: Is this truly necessary to protect life, liberty, or property? Does it minimize infringement on individual freedom? Does it serve the common good or a select interest?

Related ideas: social-contract, limited-government, state-of-nature

Monarchy: An Absurdity and an Evil

Hereditary monarchy is denounced as an irrational, unjust, and inherently corrupt system detrimental to human progress.

Paine strongly attacks monarchy, especially inherited rule. He calls it absurd because it assumes one family, regardless of skill or ability, should rule for generations. This system often puts fools or tyrants in power, creating an unstable society where people are controlled by an individual chosen by birth, not by choice or competence. He points to history, showing how monarchies have suffered from civil wars, corruption, and oppression. Also, the idea of a king being 'sacred' or chosen by God is, to Paine, a dangerous belief that blinds people to the equality of all individuals and justifies tyranny.

“Of more worth is one honest man to society and in the sight of God, than all the crowned ruffians that ever lived.”

In the book: Paine cites biblical accounts, specifically the story of Gideon and Samuel, to demonstrate that monarchy was not divinely ordained and was, in fact, warned against by God as a form of human pride and oppression. He also points to England's own history of civil strife and bloodshed directly stemming from hereditary succession.

Try this: Challenge any claims of inherent authority based on birthright, tradition, or unearned privilege. Demand that leaders be chosen based on merit, competence, and accountability to the people they serve, not on inherited status.

Related ideas: hereditary-succession, tyranny, republicanism

America's Natural Right to Independence

Paine asserts that America's geographical separation and unique circumstances make independence from Britain not just desirable, but inevitable and morally imperative.

Paine argues against the idea that America benefits from being connected to Great Britain. He says that any perceived benefits are outweighed by the costs: involvement in European wars, economic exploitation, and the difficulty of being governed by a distant power. He highlights America's vast resources and potential to be self-sufficient, suggesting its natural path is to become a leading nation, not a subordinate colony. The idea that Britain is America's 'parent country' is dismissed as a false sentimental belief; if anything, Britain has acted as an oppressor. The large ocean between them is presented as a natural barrier, a sign that God intended America to be separate.

“To be always running three or four thousand miles with a tale or a petition, waiting four or five months for an answer, which when obtained requires five or six more to explain it in, will in a few years be looked upon as folly and childishness.”

In the book: Paine highlights the economic disadvantages, such as America being dragged into British wars that have no bearing on its own interests, and the logistical absurdity of transatlantic governance. He also points to the sheer size and population of the colonies, arguing they are mature enough to stand on their own.

Try this: When confronted with arguments for maintaining an unfavorable status quo, critically evaluate if the 'benefits' are truly beneficial or merely traditional. Assess whether existing dependencies are hindering growth, self-determination, and the pursuit of a distinct identity.

Related ideas: self-determination, colonialism, nationalism

The Urgency of Action

Paine stresses that the present moment is critical for declaring independence, warning against the dangers of delay and reconciliation.

Paine argues that now is the time for America to declare independence, and that waiting or trying to reconcile with Britain is pointless and risky. He believes that the longer America remains under British rule, the harder separation will become, possibly leading to more conflict or a weakening of the revolutionary spirit. He rejects any hope for a peaceful solution, stating that Britain's repeated aggressive actions have made reconciliation impossible and undesirable. This 'now or never' plea gives his arguments a strong sense of urgency, aiming to rally public opinion and overcome inaction.

“The present time, likewise, is that peculiar time, which never happens to a nation but once, viz., the time of forming itself into a government.”

In the book: Paine points to the recent battles (Lexington and Concord) and the British military presence as undeniable proof that reconciliation is not an option. He also warns that future generations will bear the burden of inaction, facing the same struggles but with less unity and strength.

Try this: Identify critical junctures in personal or collective decision-making where delaying action could lead to missed opportunities or exacerbated problems. Recognize when a decisive break from an unsustainable situation is required, rather than prolonged negotiation.

Related ideas: kairos, revolution, political-will

America as a Beacon of Freedom

Paine envisions an independent America as a moral exemplar, a refuge for liberty, and a new beginning for humanity.

Beyond just political separation, Paine gives the American cause global importance. He argues that America has a unique chance—a fresh start—to create a government based purely on reason, liberty, and human rights, free from the corruptions of European monarchies and aristocracies. This new nation would not only secure freedom for its own citizens but also serve as a refuge for the oppressed worldwide and an inspiring example for other nations. This vision provides a strong moral reason for independence, framing it as a duty to humanity rather than just a practical political move.

“We have it in our power to begin the world over again. A situation, similar to the present, hath not happened since the days of Noah until now. The birthday of a new world is at hand.”

In the book: Paine contrasts the 'old world' with its entrenched tyrannies and superstitions with the 'new world' where reason and natural rights can flourish. He explicitly states that 'the cause of America is in a great measure the cause of all mankind.'

Try this: Consider how individual and collective actions can contribute to a larger, aspirational vision for society. Frame goals not just in terms of personal gain but in their potential to create a better world or inspire others.

Related ideas: exceptionalism, enlightenment, utopianism

The Power of Common Sense

Paine's writing style and direct address to the common person underscore his belief in universal reason and the accessibility of political truth.

The pamphlet's title, 'Common Sense,' shows Paine's belief that the truths of good government and natural rights are not complex ideas but clear to any rational person. He purposely avoids complex legal terms or classical references, choosing instead plain, direct language that the average colonist could understand. By appealing to 'common sense,' Paine empowers his readers, suggesting they have the ability to understand and judge political matters themselves, which undermines the authority of elites who claimed exclusive wisdom. This democratic approach to political discussion was revolutionary itself.

“I have heard it asserted by some, that as America hath flourished under her former connection with Great Britain, the same connection is necessary towards her future happiness, and will always have the same effect. Nothing can be more fallacious than this kind of argument.”

In the book: Paine systematically debunks common arguments for loyalty to Britain using straightforward logic and relatable analogies (e.g., a child outgrowing a parent, the absurdity of an island governing a continent). His conversational, yet forceful, tone is evidence of his direct appeal.

Try this: When evaluating complex issues, strip away jargon and ask: What is the simplest, most logical explanation? Does this argument hold up to basic reasoning? Trust your own rational faculties rather than blindly deferring to 'experts' or tradition.

Related ideas: rhetoric, public-sphere, rationalism

A Call to Arms (and Unity)

Paine argues that military preparedness and colonial unity are essential for achieving and maintaining independence.

While mainly a philosophical and political argument, 'Common Sense' also includes practical advice about military readiness and cooperation among the colonies. Paine understands that independence cannot be won or secured without a strong, united defense. He advocates for the immediate creation of a continental navy and a well-organized militia, arguing that relying on Britain's protection is no longer possible. Importantly, he stresses that the diverse colonies must overcome their local differences and unite for a single cause, recognizing that their combined strength is far greater than any single colony's power. This focus on unity was vital in overcoming local loyalties.

“Our strength is continental, not provincial. Let us then, as a band of brothers, united in affection, and united in interest, make a common cause, and bid defiance to a common foe.”

In the book: Paine outlines specific proposals for building a navy, estimating its cost and potential. He also highlights the strategic advantage of America's vast coastline and abundant timber for shipbuilding, contrasting it with Britain's dwindling resources.

Try this: Recognize that significant challenges often require collective action and the setting aside of minor differences for a greater, shared goal. Understand that true independence often requires the capacity for self-defense and strategic planning.

Related ideas: collective-security, military-strategy, federalism

The Promise of Republican Government

Paine proposes a specific vision for an American republic, emphasizing representation, frequent elections, and a focus on the common good.

Paine does not just criticize monarchy; he offers a constructive alternative: a republican government. He outlines a system of governance based on frequent elections, proportional representation, and a rotating presidency to prevent any one person or group from gaining too much power. His model emphasizes a clear separation of powers and a commitment to the rule of law, ensuring that government remains accountable to the people. This forward-looking proposal gave a concrete vision for the new nation, moving beyond mere protest to offer a workable, democratic framework for self-governance, which was crucial for building confidence in the revolutionary project.

“Let a continental conference be held, to frame a new Charter of the United Colonies, (by which means the succession of the office of President will be kept from falling into the hands of any dangerous man).”

In the book: Paine sketches out a provisional government structure, suggesting a continental congress with delegates from each colony, and a president chosen from among them, with specific rules for election and rotation. This detailed, albeit brief, blueprint provides tangible direction.

Try this: When designing or evaluating governance structures, prioritize mechanisms that ensure accountability, prevent the concentration of power, and facilitate broad representation. Advocate for systems that are adaptable and responsive to the will of the people.

Related ideas: republic, representation, checks-and-balances

Economic Freedom and Unrestricted Trade

Paine argues that independence will unleash America's economic potential by freeing it from restrictive British trade policies.

Paine understood the economic effects of independence. He argues that Great Britain's trade policies severely limited America's trade opportunities, forcing it into unfavorable relationships. An independent America, he claims, would be free to trade with all nations, maximizing its economic growth and prosperity. This freedom of trade would not only enrich the new nation but also encourage peaceful relations with European powers, as it would be in their shared interest to trade with a neutral, open American port. This economic argument provided a strong material reason for colonists, especially merchants and farmers, to support independence.

“Our plan is commerce, and that, well attended to, will secure us the peace and friendship of all Europe; because it is the interest of all Europe to have America a free port.”

In the book: Paine highlights that Britain's protection of America was primarily self-serving, aimed at maintaining a monopoly on American trade. He emphasizes that an independent America could trade its abundant raw materials (e.g., timber, iron) globally, rather than being restricted to British markets.

Try this: Evaluate economic relationships to determine if they are truly mutually beneficial or if they impose undue restrictions. Seek opportunities for diversification and open exchange to maximize growth and reduce dependency.

Related ideas: free-trade, mercantilism, economic-independence

The Moral Imperative of Freedom

Ultimately, Paine frames the struggle for independence as a fundamental moral choice between servitude and the inherent right to self-governance.

At its core, 'Common Sense' is a moral argument. Paine states that continuing to submit to British rule is not just inconvenient but morally wrong, a betrayal of natural rights and human dignity. He presents the struggle as a battle between liberty and tyranny, urging Americans to embrace their destiny as protectors of freedom. The pamphlet's passionate tone and direct appeals to conscience aimed to awaken moral outrage against oppression, turning a political disagreement into a righteous cause. This moral framework was crucial for inspiring widespread commitment and sacrifice for the revolutionary effort.

“Every spot of the old world is overrun with oppression. Freedom hath been hunted round the globe. Asia and Africa have long expelled her. Europe regards her as a stranger, and England hath given her warning to depart. O! receive the fugitive, and prepare in time an asylum for mankind.”

In the book: Paine's evocative language, such as depicting freedom as a 'fugitive' seeking refuge in America, appeals directly to the reader's sense of justice and moral duty. He repeatedly emphasizes the 'natural rights' of man as paramount.

Try this: When facing difficult decisions, consider the underlying moral principles. Ask: Does this choice uphold fundamental rights and dignity? Does it contribute to a more just and free society? Align actions with deeply held ethical convictions.

Related ideas: natural-rights, moral-philosophy, human-dignity

Common Sense Quotes

“Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.”
Paine distinguishes between society and government at the beginning of his argument.
“Small islands not capable of protecting themselves, are the proper objects for kingdoms to take under their care; but there is something absurd, in supposing a continent to be perpetually governed by an island.”
Paine challenges the notion of Britain's continued rule over America.
“The cause of America is in a great measure the cause of all mankind.”
Paine elevates the American struggle to a universal fight for liberty.
“A government of our own is our natural right.”
Paine asserts the inherent right of the colonies to self-governance.
“The sun never shined on a cause of greater magnitude.”
Paine emphasizes the historical significance of the American revolutionary cause.
“We have it in our power to begin the world over again.”
Paine calls for a fresh start, free from the old world's monarchical systems.
“Of more worth is one honest man to society and in the sight of God, than all the crowned ruffians that ever lived.”
Paine contrasts the value of an honest citizen with that of a monarch.
“For as in absolute governments the King is law, so in free countries the law ought to be King.”
Paine argues for the supremacy of law over any individual ruler.
“To say that the continent can not be long governed by an island, is to discover an error in nature, rather than in argument.”
Paine uses a geographical argument to highlight the absurdity of British rule.
“The blood of the slain, the weeping voice of nature cries, 'TIS TIME TO PART.”
Paine uses powerful imagery to argue for immediate separation from Britain after recent hostilities.
“Government by kings was first introduced into the world by pagans, from whom the children of Israel copied the custom.”
Paine attacks the divine right of kings by tracing its historical origins, associating it with paganism.
“But where, say some, is the King of America? I'll tell you, friend, he reigns above, and doth not make havoc of mankind like the Royal Brute of Britain.”
Paine humorously and sarcastically dismisses the need for an earthly monarch in America, pointing to God instead.
“Every spot of the old world is overrun with oppression.”
Paine contrasts the oppressive nature of European governments with the potential for freedom in America.
“Nothing can be a greater proof that a government is bad, than that a country must be fortified to defend that government.”
Paine argues that a government needing extensive military defense against its own people or external threats reveals its inherent flaws.

Quiz

10 questions on the main ideas. Each answer comes with a short explanation.

  1. Question 1

    Which of the following best describes the core argument Thomas Paine makes in 'Common Sense' regarding America's relationship with Great Britain?

    1. That America should seek reconciliation and better representation within the British Parliament.
    2. That America should immediately declare independence and establish a republican government.
    3. That America should form an alliance with France to pressure Britain into granting more autonomy.
    4. That America should remain loyal to the Crown but resist unjust taxation through economic boycotts.
    Show answer

    B. That America should immediately declare independence and establish a republican government. Paine's central thesis in 'Common Sense' was a radical and impassioned call for America to free itself from British rule and set up an independent republican government, rejecting any notion of reconciliation.

  2. Question 2

    Paine argues that hereditary succession and monarchical government are inherently flawed. What is one of his primary criticisms of these systems?

    1. They lead to excessive religious dogma and persecution.
    2. They often place unqualified individuals in power and can lead to tyranny.
    3. They are too expensive to maintain compared to elected officials.
    4. They discourage international trade and economic prosperity.
    Show answer

    B. They often place unqualified individuals in power and can lead to tyranny. Paine savagely attacked hereditary kingship and aristocratic institutions, arguing that the system could place an unfit or tyrannical ruler in power simply by birthright, rather than merit or consent.

  3. Question 3

    What significant impact did 'Common Sense' have on its immediate audience in 1776?

    1. It convinced the British Parliament to reconsider its policies towards the colonies.
    2. It primarily appealed to the intellectual elite, solidifying their existing support for independence.
    3. It converted thousands of citizens to the cause of American independence and spoke directly to a mass audience.
    4. It led to immediate military intervention from other European powers in support of the colonies.
    Show answer

    C. It converted thousands of citizens to the cause of American independence and spoke directly to a mass audience. The pamphlet was the first to speak directly to a mass audience—it went through fifty-six editions within a year of publication—and its assertive and often caustic style both embodied the democratic spirit he advocated, and converted thousands of citizens to the cause of American independence.

  4. Question 4

    Paine dismisses the argument that America needs Britain for protection. What is his counter-argument regarding this point?

    1. America's vast natural resources would deter any potential invaders.
    2. Britain's involvement in European wars actually drags America into unnecessary conflicts.
    3. America could easily form its own powerful navy to defend itself.
    4. Other European nations would naturally protect America's interests.
    Show answer

    B. Britain's involvement in European wars actually drags America into unnecessary conflicts. Paine argued that being tied to Britain meant America was drawn into European conflicts that were not its own, making it an enemy to countries that would otherwise be its friends.

  5. Question 5

    What type of government did Thomas Paine advocate for in 'Common Sense'?

    1. A constitutional monarchy similar to Britain's, but with more colonial representation.
    2. A direct democracy where all citizens vote on every law.
    3. An independent republican government.
    4. A confederation of independent states with no central authority.
    Show answer

    C. An independent republican government. Paine's call was for America to 'set up an independent republican government,' emphasizing representative rule over hereditary power.

  6. Question 6

    Paine uses the metaphor of a 'child' and 'parent' to describe the relationship between America and Britain. How does he subvert this common loyalist argument?

    1. He argues that America is a 'child' that has matured and is now capable of self-governance.
    2. He claims Britain was never a true 'parent' but rather an abusive captor.
    3. He suggests America's true 'parent' is Europe as a whole, not just Britain.
    4. He states that children should always obey their parents, thus contradicting his own call for independence.
    Show answer

    A. He argues that America is a 'child' that has matured and is now capable of self-governance. Paine acknowledges the 'parent' metaphor but asserts that a child, once grown, no longer needs the constant supervision of a parent and can manage its own affairs, implying America has reached this stage.

  7. Question 7

    Paine's writing style in 'Common Sense' is described as 'assertive and often caustic.' How did this style contribute to its effectiveness?

    1. It allowed for nuanced philosophical debate among scholars.
    2. It made the complex political arguments accessible and emotionally compelling to a mass audience.
    3. It alienated moderate colonists, making the divide between loyalists and patriots even wider.
    4. It was primarily aimed at impressing European monarchs with American intellectual prowess.
    Show answer

    B. It made the complex political arguments accessible and emotionally compelling to a mass audience. The 'assertive and often caustic style both embodied the democratic spirit he advocated, and converted thousands of citizens to the cause of American independence,' indicating its effectiveness in reaching and persuading a broad public.

  8. Question 8

    Paine argues that reconciliation with Britain is a 'fallacious dream.' What is one specific reason he gives for this impossibility?

    1. The vast geographical distance between the two nations makes effective governance impossible.
    2. The bloodshed at Lexington and Concord has created an irreparable breach between the two sides.
    3. Britain's military is too powerful to be challenged, making any peace temporary.
    4. The American colonies are too diverse in their interests to ever agree on terms of reconciliation.
    Show answer

    B. The bloodshed at Lexington and Concord has created an irreparable breach between the two sides. Paine explicitly states that the 'period of debate is closed' and points to the battles like Lexington and Concord as proof that the time for reconciliation has passed due to the violence inflicted by Britain.

  9. Question 9

    Beyond political independence, what social and economic principles did Paine advocate for a newly independent America?

    1. Strict adherence to traditional aristocratic hierarchies and land ownership.
    2. Personal freedom, social equality, and encouragement of economic and cultural progress.
    3. A centralized, state-controlled economy with limited individual enterprise.
    4. Maintaining a strong established church to guide moral and social order.
    Show answer

    B. Personal freedom, social equality, and encouragement of economic and cultural progress. Paine urged a new beginning for his adopted country in which personal freedom and social equality would be upheld and economic and cultural progress encouraged, reflecting his broader philosophical ideals.

  10. Question 10

    Paine refutes the claim that America's prosperity depends on its connection to Britain. What is his argument about the source of America's economic strength?

    1. America's prosperity is primarily due to British subsidies and trade agreements.
    2. America's natural resources, industriousness, and access to a global market are the true foundations of its wealth.
    3. America would only prosper if it formed an exclusive economic alliance with France.
    4. The colonies' economic strength is solely derived from their agricultural output, not trade.
    Show answer

    B. America's natural resources, industriousness, and access to a global market are the true foundations of its wealth. Paine argued that America's trade extended beyond Britain to all of Europe and that its natural resources and industrious people were the true source of its prosperity, not its colonial ties, which often restricted its trade.

Common Sense FAQ

What is the main argument of Thomas Paine's Common Sense?

Common Sense is a fervent plea for American independence from British rule. Paine argues against monarchy and hereditary succession, advocating for a republican government where citizens have a direct say in their governance and promoting principles of personal freedom and social equality.

Does Common Sense still work as a relevant text for modern political thought?

While written for a specific historical context, Common Sense's underlying principles about self-governance, individual rights, and the critique of unchecked power remain highly relevant. It serves as a foundational text for understanding the philosophical roots of democratic thought and revolutionary movements.

What is 'hereditary kingship' as criticized by Paine?

Hereditary kingship refers to a system of government where the head of state (the monarch) inherits their position based on birthright within a royal family. Paine vehemently criticized this system, arguing it was irrational, unjust, and prone to tyranny, as it did not select leaders based on merit or the will of the people.

How did Common Sense differ from other pro-independence pamphlets of its time?

Common Sense distinguished itself through its assertive, often caustic, and accessible language, directly appealing to a mass audience rather than just the educated elite. Paine's radical arguments against monarchy and his clear vision for an independent republic were also more direct and forceful than many contemporary works.

How did Common Sense influence the American Revolution?

Published just months before the Declaration of Independence, Common Sense galvanized public opinion by clearly articulating the reasons for separation from Britain and outlining a vision for an independent American republic. Its widespread distribution and persuasive arguments converted thousands to the cause of independence, making it a crucial catalyst for the Revolution.

What is the significance of Common Sense being published anonymously?

Publishing anonymously allowed Paine to avoid direct persecution for his radical views under British rule and potentially gave the pamphlet broader appeal, as readers might believe it represented a collective 'common sense' rather than just one individual's opinion. The anonymity was later shed as the pamphlet gained immense popularity.

What impact did Common Sense have on the Declaration of Independence?

Common Sense laid much of the philosophical groundwork and built popular support for the Declaration of Independence. Its arguments against monarchical rule and for self-governance provided a compelling rationale that resonated with the sentiments expressed in the Declaration, helping to prepare the public for its radical assertions.

Did Common Sense advocate for any specific form of government beyond independence?

Yes, beyond advocating for independence, Paine strongly argued for a republican form of government. He envisioned a system based on popular representation, where government derived its authority from the consent of the governed, ensuring personal freedom and social equality.

About the author

Thomas Paine

Thomas Paine

Thomas Paine was an influential political writer and philosopher active during the 18th century. He is best known for his works "Common Sense," which advocated for American independence, and "Rights of Man," which defended the principles of the French Revolution. His writings played a significant role in shaping revolutionary thought in both America and Europe.

All 2 summaries of Thomas Paine's books →

Similar books

  • Two Treatises of Government

    John Locke

    3.8 (17k) average on GoodreadsPolitics

    Provides the philosophical framework for many of Paine's arguments regarding natural rights and the social contract.

  • 1984

    George Orwell

    4.2 (3.1M) average on GoodreadsPolitics

    In a future where surveillance and thought control are absolute, a man's search for truth clashes with the Party, showing that hope can be a form of rebellion.

  • Animal Farm

    George Orwell

    4.0 (2.7M) average on GoodreadsPolitics

    A farm animals' rebellion against humans turns into a pig-led dictatorship, showing how power corrupts and revolutionary ideals are betrayed.

  • Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything

    Steven D. Levitt

    4.0 (709k) average on GoodreadsBusiness

    This book uses economic principles to reveal the surprising incentives behind everything from drug dealing and real estate to cheating teachers and the decline of crime.

  • I Am Malala: The Story of the Girl Who Stood Up for Education and Was Shot by the Taliban

    Malala Yousafzai

    4.1 (419k) average on GoodreadsPolitics

    A teenage girl from a Taliban-controlled valley refuses to give up her books, becoming a global voice for education even after an assassination attempt.

  • Atlas Shrugged

    Ayn Rand

    3.7 (354k) average on GoodreadsPolitics

    In a dystopian America where innovators vanish, a brilliant heiress races to uncover the truth behind the disappearing industrialists and the enigmatic John Galt, who vows to stop the world's progress.

More Politics summaries →

Enjoyed the summary?

A summary gives you the shape of the book. The book itself has the detail, the examples and the voice.

Find Common Sense on Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, BookBrief earns from qualifying purchases. How we're funded